Hiring private constables for subsidized housing linked to lower homicide rate

Henry Clay Webster
01/15/10

« Back

It appears that the new security policies of Northside Properties, owner of a large number of federally-subsidized houses, contributed greatly to crime reduction on the Northside during 2009.

The owner and manager of 324 units of low-income housing in California-Kirkbride, Perry Hilltop, Central Northside and Charles Street Valley, Northside Properties hired a private constable service in April 2008 to oversee the security of its properties. Since then crime has dropped substantially in these neighborhoods, leading to an overall slight drop in crime for the Northside.

616 Jacksonia Street, in the Central Northside, is one of Northside Properties' 324 subsidized housing units. (Photo/Henry Clay Webster)

While what police refer to as part-one crimes, most of which are felonies, retreated only modestly in 2009 at 1 percent on the Northside, the area saw a whopping 40 percent reduction in homicides from a year earlier. This is on top of a 10 percent drop in part-one crimes the year before.

After having 13 reported homicides in 2008, a year where violence was up across the city, The Northside had just eight in 2009.

Police officers from Zone 1, which covers the entire Northside, stopped short of presenting a direct cause of the drop, but said directing patrols to high crime areas could have played a part.

“Honestly, I don’t want to speculate on the why crime is down,” Zone 1 Lt. Michael Piasecki said.

But based on city maps that show crime by voting district, it appears that much of the overall drop stems from reductions in neighborhoods where Northside Properties owns low-income housing.

This is significant because many of the homicides in prior years and large portions of the part-one crimes stemmed from areas with high concentrations of subsidized housing.

“Brighton Place, Brightridge, Charles Street, Alpine and Garfield — those are the main streets where we’ve seen dramatic drop offs in criminal activity,” said Antione Malloy, who owns Malloy Legal Service, the constable service in charge of the properties. “A month back then [in early 2008], we were generating 25 to 30 reports a month, and now we’re down to 10.”

The constable service provides several shifts of constables, armed with the right to carry out such police duties as serving warrants and making arrests, to keep an eye on housing units seven days a week.

When incidents such as domestic disputes or fights occur, constables try to “deescalate” the situation, and then they write a report for Northside Properties. Malloy also meets every week with members of the Northside Coalition for Fair Housing, which represents and provides social services to the tenants, to discuss the reports and problematic tenants.

Basically, the private constables provide more extensive monitoring than Zone 1 police can afford.

While Zone 1 police couldn’t break down crime rates by neighborhood for the entire year yet, The Northside Chronicle compared city maps measuring part-one crimes from May 2007 to April 2009.

According to these figures, Perry Hilltop saw a drop of over 25 percent from the previous year; Charles Street Valley’s part-one crimes dropped by half; California-Kirkbride remained roughly the same; and the Central Northside rose only slightly.

Interestingly enough, these drops were met with noticeable gains in the Mexican War Streets; the part of Perry Hilltop and Fineview surrounding the Federal Street Extension; and Allegheny Center — which had the largest gain in part-one crimes at about 40 percent.

Hiring the constables was the brainchild of Northside Properties owner Bob Mistick, who took over the business from his brother Tom in April 2008.

“I’m an old ‘60s radical,” said Bob Mistick. “It was within my values to conserve and improve these conditions, particularly the violence and the condition of the housing.”

After taking over from Tom, Bob helped the Northside Coalition for Fair Housing buy 56 percent of the housing stock. This allowed Bob, whose company acts as the general partner, to make decisions that would benefit tenants rather than shareholders, such as spending money on a private constable service or putting more profits into renovating units.

“I was uncomfortable paying out most of the money to investors. I thought that the majority of the limited investors should share my world view of putting money back into the housing,” said Bob, who prefers to make most of his money through his separate construction business.

“Since [Bob has] been here, things have improved tremendously,” Ronell Guy-Curtis, executive director of the Coalition, said.

Beside hiring the constables, she said Northside Properties, with support from the Coalition, has begun serving a greater number of eviction notices than they had in the past. “There were some people that we identified that were causing problems … If people have problems, then we ask them to find other housing.”

Guy-Curtis said that oftentimes, when men leave prison, they try to move in with vulnerable single mothers living in the housing. This often causes domestic problems.

Northisde Properties pays the Coalition to meet with every tenant at least four times a year. Coalition workers use the visit to counsel some women on how to get rid of troublemaking boyfriends and also ask tenants to report bad behavior by other tenants. If enough reports arise about a particular tenant, Northside Properties will evict the individual.

Influenced by a social worker in Los Angeles named Tanya Tully, who has spent her career working with low-income people in transitional housing, Bob said that stopping the violence is only the first step. The second step is to stabilize housing by renovating units in disrepair, and the third step is to “focus on people and social issues.”

As an example of the third step, Bob envisions a program where he and his employees will help tenants clean up their houses. The idea is to teach successful life lessons so tenants can improve their quality of life.

In the future, Bob said Northside Properties may get rid of some of the housing that isn’t suitable for family living, such as the multi-family units in Charles Street Valley, and rebuild new single-family units in California-Kirkbride.

As a sign that he is making headway in improving housing conditions, Bob said that the 324 units were given an overall rating of 60 out of 100 by the government’s REAC property rating formula a few years ago. Last year, they received a 73; and at the end of this month, he’s hoping to score in the 80s.

 

****

A statement by Greg Spicer,

president of the Central Northside Neighborhood Council

We are encouraged by Bob Mistick’s efforts to improve conditions in his many properties throughout the Central Northside and neighboring communities. For years, these properties have been the locus of many serious problems in our neighborhood and we are heartened to hear that the new Northside Properties is finally working toward reducing criminal and anti-social behavior linked to these units. We also applaud any efforts to help raise our poorest residents from poverty by providing them with resources rather than simply housing them and collecting rent.

Although the constable services for NSP may have played a role in crime reduction in various neighborhoods, the reduction in criminal activity in the Central Northside neighborhood is also due to the efforts of the CNNC and many of the citizens here who have actively fought for a safer community over the past couple of years. The CNNC has installed surveillance cameras in “hot spots” throughout the neighborhood; engaged in a comprehensive community planning process which allowed us to map and better understand criminal activity; worked to close a notorious nuisance bar on Monterey Street; and have repeatedly met with the mayor, law enforcement and other city officials about how to stymie criminal activity throughout the neighborhood. 

-Greg Spicer, CNNC President
 

 

 

Comments

  • Bob
  • April 24, 2010
  • I don't think that the constables can hurt. I have had a few conversations with them while making "stops" in the area and they at least talk a good game. However, they have yet a re-evict a nearby problem squatter and failed to respond to a call after saying that they were on their way. With the volume of problems that Mistick has created throughout the Northside, their job is daunting. But they truly are the source of the problem; we watch drug and gang activity go through their property doors on a daily basis. Surveillance cameras are a nice idea, although the only one that I am aware of in the central northside is on Monterey - strategically placed to catch fatigued YMCA goers or Monterey Pub inebriates. I haven't seen one where there are actually problems.
  • What to do with the poor?
  • April 21, 2010
  • For one we can free the poor from being a political platform for liberals and from being institutionalized by housing money men like Mistick. You do not care for the poor more than I do yet I want public housing dismantled.
  • Dan W
  • February 25, 2010
  • "The majority of residents on the Northside are opposed to NSP and their constable solution." According to who? You? Linking to an old HUD report from 1998 doesn't prove anything beyond shady maintenance in the past by former management. I'd like to know what the new wealthier residents of the North Side propose we do to help the lower income North Side residents who have lived in this area for years, if not decades. Should they just conveniently go away somewhere else, even if that means they would be homeless? Hey, not my problem, right?
  • HACP, NTR and NSP named in constable fraud case
  • February 11, 2010
  • The majority of residents on the Northside are opposed to NSP and their constable solution. Aside form a pregrant woman being murdered in front of the Mistick associate housing the below memorandum from HUD shows they have been down this road before. http://disasterhousing.gov/offices/oig/reports/files/ig831804.pdf
  • Another concerned citizen
  • February 08, 2010
  • Many of us in the Northside community are grateful that NSP has taken an active approach to assisting the Police by monitoring their tenants with the use of Constables. For all the naysayers about thier efforts, we have one question. When was the last time you walked or drove through North Charles Street or Brighton Place? These are just to examples of how communities can be affected positively when Property Owners take an active role in the lives of thier tenants. Why don't some of you man up and contribute somehow in stead of letting Northside Properties foot the bill while the whole neighborhood enjoys the benefits. By the way many of us noticed the Constables out for the several marches and the African Arts in the Park. There was no mention of this anywhere.
  • Nice Try
  • January 30, 2010
  • Regarding Greg's statement, unfortunately, the fact is that the crime actually increased in the Central Northside / Mexican War Streets area. I am guessing this had more to do with Commander Brackney and her 'zero tolerance policy' that kicked in back in June or July of 2009. Maybe the constables are working?? Time will tell.
  • Brad
  • January 29, 2010
  • The article paints Mistick in a new positive light. This is no accident and is a calculated move by our leadership. The message to all of us, which will become clearer over time, is that we should make nice with Mistick and company because he promised to rebuild his section 8 across the street from Buena Vista and Brighton in sunny California-Kirkbride. He has an apple dangling over Charles St and Central Northside. He wants to build and if we agree to his self described “60s values” of caring for the poor, he will move the section 8 into California-Kirkbride along our western border. We all know of the deplorable murders of last year and we know of the demolitions of historic properties next door to Mistick and Ronells gig. No local newspaper should be blind to this for the sake of image salvaging politics. I expect a fully capable and functioning leadership to end these shenanigans and shut Mistick down and I do NOT expect them to play nice when doing so. It is completely unacceptable that a dense area of poverty should be created at the border of the Central Northside. The CNS community plan in fact forbids this and any localized CNNC executive action leading to this. Respectfully, Brad
  • January 27, 2010
  • The constables only respond to 911 calls heard over police radios - they are not hired to take the place of the Pittsburgh Police, but to assist them and NSA in collecting information to help in evicting problem tenants. Does anyone realize how difficult it is to evict a single mother living in subsidized housing? Despite clear rules set forth by HUD, sympathy, free legal help, and political factors affect decisions being made by Magistrates, Arbitration panels, and judges. Changing the world may not be as easy as you make it out to be.
  • Concerned about Concerned Citizen
  • January 27, 2010
  • I am no fan of either Bob or Tom Mistick, nor am I a fan of Northside Properties and the way that the properties are managed. However, I re-read the PG article referred to my Concerned Citizen. Here are the only mentions of the Northside in that article: "But some of the killings involve warring groups, such as the death of 18-year-old Shavaughn Wallace, a pregnant student at Indiana University of Pennsylvania who was shot May 22 on Alpine Street on the North Side. Police last week charged 18-year-old Lamon Street with Ms. Wallace's death. A witness told investigators that the shooting stemmed from three feuding groups: the Brighton Place Crips, the North Charles Street Crips and the Hoodtown Mafia." It is an article about PIRC. BTW -- what is happening with PIRC??? My point is that while the drop in murders may be viewed by folks as a 'joke', I don't think it is. A DECREASE of almost 40%, especially in the context of the small size of the geography being discussed. I don't see the correlation. when I read the article. It says nothing about who owns the property where the shooting occurs. Should Mistick not have the constables? Short of eliminating Mistick (many have tried, NONE have succeeded), is there a practical solution to further reduce crime in and around Northside Properties???
  • Dave
  • January 26, 2010
  • The quote from Ms Guy, Director of NSCFH, is 100% counter to her comments on the subject to me. Just last year, one of her tennants was housing a wanted criminal who was hauled out of her house on Saturn Way by 12 armed policemen. This is the third time the same event took place with that tennant in four years. Ms Guy spent three months battling to keep this "model tennant" in her home, defended her, and claimed there was nothing she could do to evict the tennant. That tennat is still living nextdoor to my family. Thanks Ms Guy. When I asked her about the constables, she indicated they are just there for security and do not respond to 911 calls. If they don't respond to 911 calls, how do the constables respond to domestic disturbances and fights??? Does NS Prop instruct their tennants not to report crimes to 911, but to call the constables? When I objected to HUD that Northside Properties had such a high crime problem that they had to hire their own security force, Ms Guy said they had nothing to do with responding to or reducing crime at the properties. FYI-HUD guidlines for Section 8 scattered-site landlords (like NS Properties) say the landlord will have their sec 8 license revoked if it is shown their tennants pose a threat to the surrounding community, reduce property values of neighboring homes, or interfere with neighbors' "peaceful enjoyment of their property." So, the security team is the elephant in the corner for them. Also found it interesting that the article failed to mention that NSCFH and NS Prop were GIVEN @ $2mil by the URA and HUD to buy the 56% of Mistick. They bought dillapidated, fully-depreciated properties in 2008. Then, HUD and the URA turned around the following year and GAVE NSCFH another $1.2 (I believe) to update the dillapidated properties. Guess who was getting paid this whole time to "maintain" the properties, Bob's brother Tom. Guess who still has an apparent contract in perpetuity to manage the NS Prop units, Mistick. Guess who is building all of the new developments funded by our tax dollars? Tom's construction company. So, the Misticks pulled a slick switcharoo. They sold depreciated properties that were about to cost them $1.2 mil to rehab, retained the income stream from management and construction, but eliminated any legal liability by selling the controlling interest in the holding company to a non-profit that's suit-proof. So, Bob's brother Tom sold 56% of 324 fully depreciated units for $2mil, but Tom is still getting a check every month for the management of the properties (the same income stream he got before he sold the 56%), and NSCFH is getting our tax dollars as a non-profit and funnelling them to Bob's construction company to build new units...to be managed by his brother Tom! Sweet deal guys!
  • Concerned Citizen
  • January 17, 2010
  • The constables affect the crime rates by lowering the number of 911 calls to Zone 1 Police. If we could get any real record of crime, I'm certain it would not look favorably upon the area. The whole thing is just a public political strategy to manage numbers, not to actually affect crime. Don't forget, in 1984 the Mistiks applied for and received historical designation for properties on Brighton Place in Cal/Kirkbride. When the tax credits ran out and the neighborhood became blighted because of their inaction, they began the demolition.
  • Concerned Neighbor
  • January 17, 2010
  • This article is a complete fraud. Is this organization serious in it's attempt to spin murders dropping from 13 to 8 as something to celebrate? The reality is that this article is a tacit admission that significant amounts of crime ARE taking place, and perhaps the direct result of, Mistick's properties. While murders may have dropped, the murders in 2009 were horrific scenes of intimidation, death and fear. Pregnant women were shot and killed. People were murdered and thrown out of cars in broad daylight in front of shocked neighbors - almost entirely in front of or around Mistick's properties. Read the attached article for the PG summer of 2009 and killing of a pregnant teenager on Alpine Street, where many of Mistick's properties are located and known to be turf of Hoodtown Mafia. Look at the reference to the gangs on the North Side. See the correlation? They are located in the exact same location as the concentrations of Mistick's properties. Coincidence? You decide. It is shame the Chronicle completely failed to even address these issues and is clearly not a community paper. http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09187/982040-53.stm

Leave a Comment

Name:
Email:
Website:
Message:
 

Note: The following html tags are allowed <BR> <P> <B> <I>. Your email address will never be published.

 

The Northside Chronicle
922 Middle Street Pittsburgh PA 15212
Phone: 412-321-3919 Fax 412-321-1447
email: editor@thenorthsidechronicle.com

 
Sign up for e-mail updates!